21 June 2020 - Ventilation Validation

Greenbuild is one of the first companies in Ireland to be certified by the NSAI for the new Ventilation Validation required by the 2019 Part F revision to the Building Regulations.

The details of the Ventilation Validation scheme are still being ironed out for some of the ventilation types, but for centralised heat recovery (CHRV) and central mechanical extract ventilation (CMEV) the process is fairly straightforward:

The problem is, the ventilation registers may not always be in a location that allows a flow rate to the checked.

Example of vent register above furniture - no way to get the measuring device inExample of vent register placed above furniture - no way to get the measuring device in Example of vent register _in_ furniture - no way to get the measuring device to itExample of vent register _in_ furniture - no way to get the measuring device to it. In this case the register is built into a kitchen cupboard, with a hole out the top to allow the air to move. Example of high register - how can the validator reach up to this?Example during construction of register high up, near the ridge in a high ceiling (green dot). This cannot be reached easily and may require a safety platform to be erected to allow the flow rates to be validated. We cannot see how the usual safe 3 points of contact could be maintained on a ladder in this case while trying to measure air flows. Again - in cases like this what will the commissioning engineer have done for balancing?


Now, if we cannot reach the unit to validate it, it is quite likely the commissioning engineers also could not reach the unit for correct balancing.

The lesson has to be, if the home is to have ventilation validation performed, all the registers must be in a location that can be reached by a validator (and a balancer!). If you are involved in designing and/or installing ventilation systems, or are to put one in your home please bear this in mind.

So, please:

17 Feb 2020 - The moon in Infra red

While doing a thermal imaging infra-red survey of a home recently, in the early morning, the moon was brilliant in the sky.

So we took a thermal image of it.

Now, we are no experts in astronomical thermal imaging, but still with the camera on full zoom the image was as we say in these part, a bit of craic!

Original full image, moon small circle
original full image - moon waning
Smoothed out, zoomed in thermogram of moon
smoothed out, zoomed in thermogram (thermal image) of moon waning
Note that we did not alter the camera settings for this image

10 Feb 2020 - Airtightness of Blockwork - Part 4

Back in 2013 we had a little series about the airtightness, or not, of concrete blocks. Over the years we have had reason to talk to quite a few people about this. (See previous blog entry from 2013 here).

Today was the first time in a while where we have had to explicitly show a site supervisor why doing a pretest on a building with completed membrane, but incomplete plaster layer on blockwork does not make a lot of sense.

Of course, we did a test as requested, no surprise that the result is over 10 m3/hr.m2, but to be fair that should improve massively once the plaster layer is complete.

Example of condition of walls during test. membrane complete - window tape complete, no plastering thoughExample of condition of building during test - membrane complete, window taping complete, no plaster on walls Example of a leak at a mortar joint - one of very manyExample of a leak at a mortar joint - one of very many Example of leakage through blockwork, using 'tape off of some of a block, with a hole to allow air flow outExample of leakage through the block itself

The story in the 3 images above is this:

The main interest here, as we have not really shown this in the 2013 sequence, the leakage is through the block grain itself.
We could have a bit of fun with numbers and just pretend for fun that the hole size here at the tape is 2cm2.

If so, then the air volume through this 1/2 block in test conditions is 0.01 m3/hr, so the whole block could be 0.02 m3/hr.
If there are about 10 blocks per square meter, and the wall area in this house is 260 m2, allowing even 15% of that to be mortar (a bit high), say we have 220 m2 of blockwork, so that is ca 2200 blocks, which is then about 2200 * 0.02 = 44 m3/hr.

To be fair, the vastly greater proportion of leakages through unplastered blockwork is through the mortar joints - this leakage here directly through the block grain on a very rough sum is only about 1% of the observed leakage rate (but it still counts!)


  Current Year
Previous Blog Entries...
2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012

Airtightness testing - IS EN9972:2015 Certified Member of the Irish Passive House Association

Greenbuild Energy Rating and Building Information Services Ltd trading as
Gorey, Co. Wexford
Tel: 087 2521032
All information presented here is without warranty or guarantee.